In line with "cancamusa urticaria."
Dedicated Julio Bonis
True and complete agreement with this "exile" the primary, I believe temporarily.
try to describe two examples of modern situations cancamusas.
The first is the situation so common at least in my environment, in which a patient who has been summoned to review any service by any incurable disease, most of them.
A week before the patient falls ill or is quoted in the court or his father at 300 km is in critical situation and the inevitable consequence is that you can not go to such consultation, as best will call by phone to change the date:
Administrative (A) - XX Hospital, outpatient tell me!
Patient (P) - Look I'm calling because I can not keep the appointment on April 25 with Dr. Fulanez and would like to change daily.
A-Tell me the name. P-Alfredo Alvarez
Harassed.
A-Your number is 000000/ooo/1? P-Si
A-Note, on 11 November at 13.40 in the 203 refers to the second floor.
P "Well, not if I have explained, wanted to change the date because on April 25 have been cited in court ..
A-I have already understood, note on 11 November at 13.40 in the 203 refers to the second floor.
P-But Dr. Fulanez, the I saw in the hallway, he told me to call him to change day ...
A-The first book I have quoted for the equipment of the unit affected by the disease is on 11 November, or not want it.
P-The date of April 25 given to me in November last year and I just want to change the day.
A-I repeat that the first appointment is free on 11 November, is the want or not want? Q.
I can do?
A-You can go to your GP and to make an emergency wheel. When you have recalled to give you a first consultation with the team affected the unity of their disease.
The application of this simple computer technology required to implement a solution to a common problem with other professional appointment, forgery of a document, finally settling back on the track "official", otherwise the patient is automatically ejected from the system.
The program is bad and application failure.
The second case concerns what time shows. There are many programs that have developed in the different autonomous regions, I can not know all, enough is known to the mine, the OSABIDE.
At a recent meeting, a nurse, who so carefully put in collecting data about their activities, it was discovered that can only be measured when using or the History of OSABIDE and faculty that the program only measures whether or not you use the History of OSABIDE not be used to ACG, or activities, or to chronically record as acknowledged in the document for chronic care.
The program is bad and application failure.
I agree with Julio, the primary function of 2.0 should be to separate the wheat from the chaff, too much dust in the mirror.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons .
|
|
---|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment